ChatGPT generated these A-level GP essay introductions, and this definitely gives us some things to think about.
1. How can this tool help students find their own voice and conviction, beyond just picking up and stringing bigger words?
2. Are these versions even desirable for the A-Level context? Or are only parts of these versions desirable? Or not at all? Why?
3. Even if they are partially suitable for the actual A-levels, is this writing sustainable by a regular student over an entire essay under timed conditions? If yes, then how?
Is violence ever justified?
AI’s simple version :
In an era marked by profound social, political, and ethical considerations, the question of whether violence can ever be justified stands as a pivotal inquiry. The complexities of this matter have been scrutinized from moral, historical, and philosophical perspectives, each offering insights into the circumstances under which violence might be deemed acceptable. As societies grapple with instances of conflict, oppression, and the struggle for justice, the discourse surrounding the legitimacy of violence becomes increasingly relevant. This essay delves into the multifaceted nature of violence and aims to explore the nuanced conditions that might warrant its justification, while also acknowledging the compelling arguments against resorting to such means. By examining both sides of this contentious issue, we can better comprehend the intricate interplay between human rights, societal welfare, and the pursuit of equitable solutions.
AI’s clear version :
In a world where differing ideologies, conflicting interests, and complex moral dilemmas persist, the question of whether violence can ever be justified remains a subject of profound contemplation. The issue transcends cultural, ethical, and historical boundaries, sparking fervent debates among philosophers, scholars, policymakers, and individuals alike. The concept of justified violence raises essential questions about the inherent value of human life, the principles governing self-defense and collective security, and the boundaries of ethical conduct in the face of oppression and injustice. By delving into the nuanced interplay of moral reasoning, practical necessity, and the pursuit of a just society, this essay will navigate the complexities surrounding the potential justifiability of violence, examining various perspectives and considerations that shape our understanding of this contentious matter.
AI’s sophisticated version :
In an intricate interplay of ethical contemplation and human history’s tumultuous narrative, the question of whether violence can ever be justified emerges as a captivating enigma that continues to reverberate through the corridors of moral discourse. Rooted in the very essence of human nature, the dichotomy between pacifism and the resort to force to redress grievances has ignited intellectual conflagrations spanning centuries. From the intricate quandaries posed by just war theory to the agonizing choices faced by individuals in the throes of oppression, the inquiry into the admissibility of violence unveils a profound dialectic that interlaces philosophical ruminations, sociopolitical exigencies, and the boundless spectrum of human emotions. This essay embarks upon an odyssey to navigate these turbid waters, probing the depths of morality, the horizons of legitimate defense, and the intricacies of power dynamics, with the ultimate aim of unraveling the intricate fabric of justification that may, in rarefied instances, lend credence to the begrudging acceptance of violence as a reluctant harbinger of justice.
The reminder we need about the social contract
Essay Content : Leave science to the scientists. (AJC Prelim 2012)
Read the links for further supporting details
- http://www.ucsusa.org/scientific_integrity/abuses_of_science/how-corporations-corrupt-science.html
- http://www.michaelcrichton.net/essay-stateoffear-whypoliticizedscienceisdangerous.html
- http://www.forbes.com/sites/janetraedupree/2013/09/25/us-scientists-are-leaving-the-country-and-taking-the-innovation-economy-with-them/
- http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-drug-company-money-undermining-science/
- http://www.nytimes.com/glogin?URI=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2014%2F03%2F16%2Fscience%2Fbillionaires-with-big-ideas-are-privatizing-american-science.html%3F_r%3D0
- http://www.michaelcrichton.net/essay-nytimes-patentinglife.html
- http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114127/science-not-enemy-humanities
- http://www.singaporestatement.org/statement.html
- http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/andrewbrown/2012/sep/26/evil-science-soviet-bioweapons-research
- http://listverse.com/2007/11/18/top-10-evil-scientists/
- http://qz.com/179464/china-is-spending-a-fortune-on-science-and-is-getting-robbed-blind-by-corrupt-scientists/
- http://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2000/mar/18/debate
- http://theconversation.com/scientific-fraud-sloppy-science-yes-they-happen-13948
- http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21588057-scientists-think-science-self-correcting-alarming-degree-it-not-trouble
- http://curt-rice.com/2013/02/06/why-you-cant-trust-research-3-problems-with-the-quality-of-science/
- http://www.drbriffa.com/2011/09/16/scientific-evidence-appears-to-be-becoming-steadily-more-unreliable/
- http://www.nationalaffairs.com/doclib/20080710_20021461howtoregulatesciencefrancisfukuyama.pdf
- http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21588069-scientific-research-has-changed-world-now-it-needs-change-itself-how-science-goes-wrong
- http://www.theguardian.com/business/2013/jul/21/big-pharma-secret-drugs-trials
- http://hbr.org/2012/07/why-life-science-needs-its-own-silicon-valley/ar/1
- http://backreaction.blogspot.sg/2013/01/private-funding-for-science-good-idea.html
- http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2010/10/how-the-scientific-consensus-on-global-warming-affects-american-business-and-consumers
- http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=131099083
- http://www.theguardian.com/science/2011/apr/04/morality-drugs-improve-ethical-behaviour
- http://www.salon.com/2014/04/05/richard_dawkins_is_so_wrong_it_hurts_what_the_science_vs_religion_debate_ignores/
- http://www.its.caltech.edu/~nmcenter/sci-cp/sci85072.html
- http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-macmillan/bill-nye-creation-debate_b_4775207.html